When it comes to the debate on free will vs determinism, it is important to consider the historical views and arguments that have been presented throughout the years.

Aristotle's View

One of the earliest and most notable figures in this debate was Aristotle, who argued that all events have a cause and therefore are determined, but that humans have the ability to choose their actions within those predetermined events. This view is known as compatibilism, which we will discuss in a later lesson.

Middle Ages

During the Middle Ages, the debate shifted to religious beliefs, with many arguing that God's omnipotence meant that everything was predetermined. This view was challenged by Thomas Aquinas, who argued that humans have free will and that God's omnipotence did not negate this ability.

Modern Era

In the modern era, the debate has been shaped by the rise of scientific discoveries and theories. Determinism has been supported by the discoveries of Newtonian physics and the natural laws that govern the universe. However, philosophers such as Immanuel Kant argued that humans have a transcendental freedom that is not bound by the laws of nature.

Overall, the historical views on free will vs determinism have been shaped by religious beliefs, philosophical arguments, and scientific discoveries. Each perspective offers unique insights into the debate and continues to influence the discussion today.

All courses were automatically generated using OpenAI's GPT-3. Your feedback helps us improve as we cannot manually review every course. Thank you!