💡 Learn from AI

Theories of Justice

The Rawlsian Theory of Justice

The Rawlsian Theory of Justice

The Rawlsian Theory of Justice is one of the most influential theories of justice in contemporary political philosophy. It was developed by John Rawls in his 1971 book, A Theory of Justice. Rawls argued that justice is fairness, and that a just society is one that individuals would agree to if they did not know their own place in that society.

The Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance

Rawls believed that individuals in a just society would agree to principles of justice from an original position, a hypothetical situation in which individuals are behind a veil of ignorance. This means that individuals do not know their own place in society, their natural abilities or talents, their race, gender, religion, or any other characteristics that might give them an advantage or disadvantage in society. In this way, Rawls believed that individuals would make impartial decisions about what principles of justice are fair.

The Two Principles of Justice

Rawls proposed two principles of justice that individuals in the original position would agree to. The first principle is the principle of equal basic liberties. This principle guarantees equal political liberties, such as the right to vote and the freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. The second principle is the difference principle, which allows for economic and social inequalities as long as they benefit the least advantaged members of society. According to this principle, inequalities are only just if they work to the advantage of those who are worst off in society.

Criticisms of the Rawlsian Theory of Justice

The Rawlsian Theory of Justice has been widely discussed and debated since its publication in 1971. One of the main criticisms of the theory is that it is too idealistic and does not take into account the realities of power and inequality in society. Critics argue that the veil of ignorance is impossible to achieve, and that individuals are always aware of their own identities and interests. Other critics argue that the difference principle is not sufficient to address issues of systemic inequality and that more radical redistribution is necessary to achieve a just society.

Despite these criticisms, the Rawlsian Theory of Justice remains an important and influential theory of justice in contemporary political philosophy.

Take quiz (4 questions)

Previous unit

The Feminist Theory of Justice

Next unit

Conclusion: Applying Theories of Justice in Society

All courses were automatically generated using OpenAI's GPT-3. Your feedback helps us improve as we cannot manually review every course. Thank you!